Showing posts with label Catholic. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Catholic. Show all posts

16 October 2009

Unity Through Mary

Nothing is new under the sun. This is especially true when it comes to Christological errors. Even in the New Testament the people and the Apostles are confronted with Jesus and are mystified by who he is and who he is not. This problem is brought to the fore by Jesus when he asks "Who do people say that I am?" and alternately "Who do you say that I am?" The answers vary. Some think that Jesus is the prophet foretold to usher in the Messianic Age. Some think that he is really John the Baptist or some other Prophet sent to God's chosen people. But the remarkable answer given in faith, given to the first among the apostles by God is when Jesus is called the "Son of God." What a striking revelation! Elsewhere Jesus calls Himself the "Son of Adam" and yet he affirms that he is also "Son of God." And here in lies the problem. These names would seem to be mutually exclusive but yet in Jesus they find a unity. It is in these names that we find the doctrine of the Hypostatic Union, i.e., the unity of the two natures of Christ (human & divine) in the one person of Christ without division, addition, subtraction nor dimishment of either natures. If one is contemplating this mystery about the person of Jesus and not struck by perplexity and awe then there is little hope that the one contemplating this mystery does not suffer from the vice of acadia which is deadly to the souls path toward holiness. But if this mystery is respected for its utter profundity then one cannot help at times but to err on the side of emphasising Christ's humanity or His divinity.

Son of Man

To a first century Jew it would be odd to hear someone refer to himself by the title "son of Man." What was common was the term "son(s) of Abraham" emphasising the relationship of the promise through the covenant between God and His people. But Jesus chooses to use the word Man instead of Abraham. This is an obvious reference to the beginning of Genesis where the Man is created from the earth by God. This word 'adam is in fact not a proper name but a generic word that first means 'Mankind' and is then later applied to the historical man we call Adam (the husband of Eve). What is significant about this is that by calling himself the "Son of Man" Jesus is universalizing himself. He is not only the Son of the Hebrew people (a son of Abraham) but he is a Son of all of humanity and is himself a part of that same humanity in direct relationship to Adam. This is perhaps the clearest image of Jesus that we can gather - his humanity - since it is that which is the most present to us in an empirical way. We have access to this Jesus through our senses and we know good men in our own lives and so it is not a challenge to our human understanding to know about and love Jesus in the flesh.

Son of God

Just as "Son of Man" refers directly to the likeness of Jesus to Adam so too the name "Son of God" demonstrates the same categorical relationship between Jesus and God the Father. A son is begotten of a Father and so too this Son - Jesus - is begotten of the Heavenly Father and he and the Father are one. This is most emphasised by the Gospel of John and especially in the First chapter where Jesus is identified as the Word (Logos) which similar to the use of the word Man also references the beginning of Genesis. Yet, it references the eternity that is before the beginning of time since the Word was indeed with God and was God. This is also evident in the writings of St. Paul where worship is directed toward the person of Jesus. Oddly this would naturally be the notion of Jesus that we as human beings would have the hardest time relating to in an intimate way. Yet, in my experience it is the divinity of Christ that most people seem to reference when they speak about Him or worse yet, they turn Jesus into something ethereal and he becomes almost ghostlike in their imagining of Him. Jesus becomes remote and passionless in the mind of the person contemplating this aspect of Jesus and thus cannot be reconciled with Him being fully Man in all things but sin.

Son of Mary

It is no surprise that in the first few centuries of the Church there was heated debate about who Jesus was. Heated may be too mild of a term considering that in some places there were the equivalent of "gang wars" in the streets between those who held differing theological opinions about the person of Jesus. To help resolve this problem the Church had recourse to another title for Jesus found in Scripture. Jesus is proclaimed as Son of God, he is self identified as the Son of Man and he is recognized by all as the Son of Mary. It is this latter name that holds the key to uniting the two former names. It is for this reason that at the Council of Ephesus the Council Fathers discerned that a solution to the problem of trying to hold together these two seemingly incompatible notions of Jesus was to affirm the title given to Mary as Theotokos - God Barer. If we can view Jesus through the lens of being the Son of Mary then we can make a little more sense out of the mystery of the Hypostatic Union. It is from her pure flesh that the Divine Logos took human nature void of sin and it was in her womb that the uncreated Word of God thus became incarnate and was born into this world for the salvation of our souls. The two natures come together in a single unity in the womb of the Blessed Mother. It is for this reason that devotion to Our Lady has stood for two millennium! It is through her that we are able to better understand Him and thus enter into a authentic relationship with Jesus as He is, who He is. As an ancient hymn recounts: Mary the shrine, Christ the God adored!

16 February 2009

Leper! Unclean!

It seems fitting to me that my first venture into the noisy world of the blog-o-sphere is a reflection on the readings from the Mass this past Sunday concerning Leprosy; since I am pretty sure this blog will be on the fringe of the blogging community as the leper was to Israel.

Perhaps there is a reason why most people know about the times that Christ healed the lepers. Even non-Christians and even those who have not read anything in Scripture seem to know about the lepers. They know that they were segregated from the people in the Old Testament and they know that Jesus healed them in the New Testament. But just knowing these facts doesn't explain why it has left such an imprint in the minds of all who have heard about this reality. It seems to me that in this image of the Leper more than any other image in Scripture we see ourselves, as if in a mirror, in a way that is, on the one hand, disturbing and, on the other hand, intoxicatingly hopeful.

In the Leper we most clearly see ourselves in the words of Scripture. This is the secret of the Leper. Hidden within the folds of his tattered and torn garments, rent by his own hands we find our true selves. Not the selves that we display to the world, but, rather, the afflicted person behind the mask of the persona. He unveils us. He is a revelation of ourselves to ourselves. He is the weakness that we meet in our own eyes when we give sufficient time for self reflection. He is the inner yearning of our very human heart who feebly raises spotted, unclean hands to the heavens burning for a salve - a savior. The Leper is burned into our minds because he disturbs our self-disregard. He forces us to confront our weakness in the face of torment and surrender to that very weakness for which there is only one response - the response of hope.

Hope is such a fragile thing. Hope is in the Leper because he has no power over his plight. He is doomed to a sorrow not of his own making. He was born of health and then one day we was born again into corruption. We know this. We feel this in our very fiber of being. We have no control and so seek to control all that we may not. Seeking satisfaction in denying our leprosy by bringing others into the foul reek of our sickness. But we have no power to save and since we yearn to be like God we strive for this mastery of others and self not for ill but for what we conceive to be good. But each time our weakness denies our strength and we collapse under the weight of our own good intentions. Hope is fragile because it is so easily lost. Hope can be shattered into a thousand pieces by a mere glance, a single word. It can be buried by the avalanche of responsibilities placed upon us or stolen by the theft of mortality. Hope is not as stable as charity nor as firm as faith but is like a crystal bobble in the hands of an infant. It is something we know not how to preserve. But yet every Leper hopes!

The Leper who has lived long enough in his own demise has mourned the loss of the perception of his own power. He cannot control is ill. He cannot will his skin to health. He has not the beauty to abide his own reflection and is bitter toward the health he perceives in others. But he hopes for an anointing of his flesh by some yet unknown power that will condescend to him, an outcast, and do that which he himself cannot do. He has no cause for hope but yet he hopes. He hears rumors of the possibility of health and he hopes. When Christ heals the Leper we catch a glimpse of our own hope of salvation as his hope, our hope!, becomes a reality. This is the rumor of our own possibility of hope and so we are transfixed by the healed Leper and yearn. This is why the Leper cannot contain himself though the Lord enjoined him to remain silent. That which was impossible was done - hope was realized. The world is not large enough for his response!

Hope is fragrant oil and Christ is the burning flame that gives it its own purpose. The Leper cannot heal himself but he is healed by the unfathomable flame of Divine Love. This is why we can't place our hope in other things or people because they have to power to heal our inner weakness. They cannot reach into our heart and reform it into living flesh. They did not fashion, so too, they cannot refashion. It is the Lord who both makes and remakes, reproves and heals, brings into being and brings into fullness of being. King David cries out: "Put not your trust in princes, but in the Lord." He knew. If our hope lies in the hands of princes it will shatter or be stolen but if our hope is in the Lord it will be elevated and brought to realization. This too is why Christianity and Christians fail people so often. Those who seek see in Christ the hope of healing but that hope, that fragile thing is so easily broken. We destroy the hope of these little ones who come seeking hope in their own way by trying to be their hope instead of being their guide to Him who is our only Hope. We must say, "I too am a Leper in need of an Anointed Anointer." I cannot realize my own hope by my own work. Why then do I think that I may realize the hope of others? The Leper sought out Christ and Christ healed the Leper. Gather, then, the Lepers in their despair and hope and lead them to the Lord who will anoint us all with the oild of gladdness and fulfill our one true hope.